How widespread is the use of AI in U.S. dental practices? While AI is increasingly visible in marketing materials and media, real-world adoption remains moderate, but growing steadily. In this article we’ll look at current usage rates, practice- and patient-level attitudes, practical benefits, adoption barriers, and what the future may hold.

Current Adoption Rates in U.S. Dentistry

Recent data shows that about 35% of dental practices in the U.S. have implemented some form of AI-powered technology in their clinical or administrative workflows. For example, dentists use AI tools for tasks like interpreting radiographs, reviewing digital scans, or automating administrative tasks.

Among those using AI, roughly 77% report a positive impact—noting improvements in speed, diagnostic support, and workflow efficiency. In short: one-third of practices have adopted AI, and most of those users see real value.

Frequency of Use

According to one survey, about 22% of dentists report using AI tools at least once a week.

That suggests many clinics are using AI intermittently – perhaps for specific tasks like reviewing panels or assisting with diagnostics – but not relying on it for every patient visit. Widespread daily use is still relatively uncommon.

Who Is Using AI: Practice Types & Segments

Solo & Small Practices

Smaller general practices tend to adopt more targeted tools like image-analysis add-ons or chatbot assistants rather than full-suite solutions. Adoption is often cautious due to cost, training requirements, or workflow integration concerns.

Dental Service Organizations (DSOs) & Group Practices

Larger group practices and DSOs are leading AI adoption across new technologies and imaging systems, especially those centrally required for diagnostics or billing analytics. Over 2,500 U.S. clinics – particularly within networks using platforms like Overjet – were part of large-scale studies and implementations.

DSOs value standardized diagnostics, patient outcome metrics, and administrative consistency across offices, which aligns well with AI capabilities.

Attitudes and Trust Among Dentists & Patients

A recent peer-reviewed survey found:

  • Only 3.8% of U.S. dentists fully trust diagnoses made entirely by AI.
  • Around 45% support using AI for data collection and initial analysis, provided the clinician makes the final call.

Most patients and practitioners are cautious: while they see AI as useful, only a small percentage are comfortable abandoning human oversight. This points toward a hybrid model: AI-assisted, clinician-approved decision-making being the preferred mode.

subscribe to our newsletter

SUBSCRIBE

Why Some Dentists Are Adopting AI

Better Diagnostics & Workflow

Practices report AI helps detect early decay, bone loss, and other conditions faster—often well before symptoms are visible to the naked eye. The tools can reduce misdiagnosis and help standardize interpretations across providers.

Patient Trust & Case Acceptance

Studies suggest that 59% of patients are more likely to trust a practice that uses AI in care decisions. Putting annotated images or AI overlays in front of patients can also boost case acceptance and treatment compliance.

Efficiency & ROI

Much of what dentists like about AI involves time savings: automated analysis speeds up intake, triage, diagnostics, and treatment planning. AI-based workflows can also cut down on administrative hours and reduce billing mistakes.

What Holds Some Dentists Back?

  • Cost & training: High-end AI systems may require significant investment and staff learning time.
  • Trust concerns: As seen, few dentists fully trust AI without oversight, especially for clinical decisions.
  • Integration challenges: Many clinics still struggle with integrating cloud-based AI tools with existing imaging hardware or practice-management systems.
  • Evidence barriers: While diagnostic accuracy is improving, many clinicians still look for long-term patient outcome data and independent validation before widespread adoption.

Case Study Data: Large‑Scale Implementation

A major study published in 2025 evaluated an AI scoring system called Oral Score Basic (OS‑B) across 2,558 U.S. dental practices serving over 343,000 patients. It demonstrated how AI-generated metrics can go beyond simple diagnostics to quantify disease severity and estimate treatment costs. This scale of deployment shows that certain AI solutions are already being rolled out systematically across U.S. practices.

The research confirms that anywhere from small clinics to large networks are exploring advanced AI applications, and that at least within deployments, adoption is expanding quickly.

Regional & Practice Variation

Exact penetration varies by region and practice model. Urban practices and DSOs with higher patient volume often adopt early, while solo clinics or rural practices adopt more slowly. However, the national average remains in the mid‑30% range as of late 2024.

What the Trendline Looks Like

AI adoption has accelerated steadily over the past decade:

  • Between 2011 and 2021, scientific publications referencing dental AI grew by 21.6% annually; more recently, the five-year growth rate climbed to 34.5%.
  • Market research projects the U.S. portion of the dental AI market to continue growing rapidly, with double-digit compound annual growth rates through 2030.

These trends suggest that more than half of practices may adopt AI tools in clinical or admin workflows within the next 3–5 years.

subscribe to our newsletter

SUBSCRIBE

Summary: Key Figures at a Glance

  • ~190,000 practicing dentists in the U.S. overall.
  • ~35% currently use AI tools in their practice.
  • ~22% use AI at least weekly.
  • ~77% of adopters report positive outcomes.
  • ~45% support AI for data analysis, but only 3.8% trust fully autonomous AI diagnoses.
  • Adoption is strongest among large group practices and DSOs, with broader use in urban/suburban regions.

What to Expect Next: Adoption Drivers

Regulatory & Standards Support

The American Dental Association (ADA) has issued standards and technical reports on responsible evaluation of dental imaging AI systems in the U.S. These include guidelines for independent validation datasets and performance metrics. Clear guidance helps clinicians feel more confident integrating AI tools.

Technology Integration

As more imaging hardware supports AI features (e.g. intraoral or CBCT systems with built-in analysis), small practices may find entry easier. Over time, AI-driven tools will become part of the standard imaging setup.

Education & Training

Dental schools are adding AI-related modules and promoting evidence-based decision-making. As newer graduates enter practice more comfortable with AI, adoption is likely to rise.

Tips for Dentists Considering AI

  1. Start small – try an image analysis or admin-assist tool before fully integrating.
  2. Verify FDA clearance and HIPAA compliance for clinical tools.
  3. Pilot use in a subset of cases (e.g., bitewings or CBCT) before broader rollout.
  4. Provide staff training and documentation for workflow integration.
  5. Track outcomes, case acceptance, and patient feedback to gauge real value.
  6. Stay informed on ADA recommendations and emerging standards.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is AI usage growing faster in DSOs compared to solo practices?

Yes, DSOs are more likely to adopt centralized imaging and billing AI systems quickly due to scale.

Are most dentists using AI daily?

Not yet: the survey shows weekly or less frequent use is common, while daily reliance remains limited.

Are patients comfortable with AI in dentistry?

Many see it as helpful, but few trust AI-derived decisions without clinician involvement.

Where can I find U.S.-based validation or guidance for AI tools?

The ADA provides white papers and technical reports evaluating AI tools for 2D radiographic analysis.

Conclusion

As of 2024, about 1 in 3 U.S. dental practices have adopted AI tools, with most users reporting a positive impact, but full trust in AI-driven clinical decisions is still rare. Adoption is strongest in group practices and DSOs, while solo clinics tend to proceed more gradually. Nevertheless, rapid growth, affordability improvements, and regulatory guidance suggest AI use will rise, likely pushing adoption above 50% in the coming years.